Which of the following is NOT a type of contingency construction?

In the context of contingency construction, the focus is on the different approaches that can be taken when dealing with structural or programming decisions in uncertain environments. The correct answer identifies "Permanent" as not being a type of contingency construction.

Contingency construction is primarily associated with strategies that must adapt to variable conditions; therefore, types like organic, temporary, and initial can be seen as approaches that allow for flexibility and adaptation.

Organic contingency construction typically refers to a more fluid and adaptive style that evolves with experience and the environment. Temporary contingenices are designed to address immediate needs and may not last beyond a certain situation. Initial contingencies can be viewed as the preliminary frameworks set up to allow for future adjustments.

In contrast, "Permanent" implies a fixed and unchanging approach, which does not align with the fundamental characteristics of contingency construction that inherently focus on adaptability and the ability to respond to changing variables or new information. Thus, it correctly stands out as the type that does not fit within the typical classifications of contingency construction.